The Pitts­burgh po­lice union has filed a griev­ance over a new pol­icy that bans of­fi­cers from wear­ing base­ball caps and re­quires them to wear their bul­let-re­sis­tant vests un­der­neath uni­forms rather than out­side them.

The union ar­gued in its griev­ance dated Sun­day that the of­fi­cers’ for­mal hats are cum­ber­some and that many of­fi­cers have said they will not wear vests be­neath their shirts be­cause they are hot, cause changes to their skin and that they limit their move­ment.

Sonya Toler, Pitts­burgh pub­lic safety spokes­woman, said Wed­nes­day that pub­lic safety di­rec­tor Ste­phen Bu­car, a for­mer FBI agent, wants of­fi­cers to look pro­fes­sional but not “tac­ti­cal.”

“Re­search shows that cloth­ing plays a large role in how a per­son is per­ceived. The same holds true for po­lice of­fi­cers,” she said in an email. “In fact, there is a body of re­search sug­gest­ing that even slight al­tera­tions to the style of the uni­form will change how cit­i­zens, in­clud­ing crim­i­nals, per­ceive the of­fi­cer.”

Among the stud­ies she cited were some con­ducted through the FBI and U.S. Depart­ment of Justice.

In its griev­ance, the po­lice union says that mem­bers of the Fra­ter­nal Order of Po­lice Lodge No. 1 met with Mr. Bu­car Fri­day to dis­cuss the changes. It quotes Mr. Bu­car as say­ing that ex­ter­nal vests make of­fi­cers look “mil­i­tary” and base­ball caps make them look like “mall guards.”

Changes in the stan­dards for vest ma­teri­als have caused rashes and over­heat­ing, and as a re­sult, Pitts­burgh of­fi­cers were pre­vi­ously al­lowed to pur­chase out­side vests, ac­cord­ing to the griev­ance.

The union also ar­gues that Mr. Bu­car has an outer vest him­self.

The union wrote that the dress uni­form hat is “cum­ber­some” and “non func­tional for the va­ri­ety of du­ties a po­lice of­fi­cer per­forms.”

“Fur­ther­more, no in­for­ma­tion has been pro­vided to the FOP that cit­i­zens or crim­i­nals are con­fused re­gard­ing the iden­tity of Pitts­burgh Po­lice Of­fi­cers while wear­ing the ap­proved base­ball cap,” the griev­ance ends.

Ms. Toler said the pub­lic safety de­part­ment would not com­ment on the griev­ance spe­cif­i­cally. She said Mr. Bu­car wants of­fi­cers’ uni­forms to give a mes­sage of “power” and “au­thor­ity.”

“How­ever,” she said, “he wants that mes­sage to be con­veyed in a pro­fes­sional man­ner not a tac­ti­cal man­ner. Wear­ing the vests on the out­side con­veys a tac­ti­cal mes­sage that [the di­rec­tor] be­lieves is not nec­es­sary dur­ing nor­mal pa­trol­ling.”

Of­fi­cer Howard McQuil­lan, pres­i­dent of the Pitts­burgh po­lice union, did not re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment Wed­nes­day.
Liz Navratil: lnavratil@post-ga­zette.com, 412-263-1438 or on Twit­ter @LizNavratil.

http://www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2014/09/04/Pittsburgh-police-union-files-grievance-over-ball-caps-body-armor/stories/201409040177